Home > DocuBase > Article

« All DocuBase Articles

 

Follow DocuTicker on Twitter Bookmark and Share   Feed

Tuesday, 20th May 2014

The European Parliament: A Failed Experiment in Pan-European Democracy?

Source: Open Europe (UK)

From Executive Summary:

The European Parliament (EP) now has legislative powers over the vast majority of EU policies, from regulating working hours to vetoing EU trade agreements. However, while the use of ‘co-decision’, under which MEPs have equal status with national ministers to pass EU legislation, has more than doubled during the last two decades (from 27% to 62%), turnout in European elections has fallen from 57% to 43%. Many individual MEPs work hard and conscientiously for their constituents. However, voters’ declining engagement would suggest that, despite its ever-increasing powers under successive EU treaties, the EP has failed to gain popular democratic legitimacy.

The common view that voter apathy is largely due to a lack of awareness or public ignorance is simplistic. Data from the European Commission’s Eurobarometer public opinion surveys shows that, across the EU, there is no correlation between interest in EU affairs or awareness of the EP and voter turnout. For example, in Romania and Slovakia, 81% and 79% of people respectively say they are aware of the European Parliament, but only 28% and 20% turned out to vote in 2009. In the Netherlands, 61% say they are interested in European affairs – the highest in the EU – yet the turnout of voters at 36% is one of the lowest.

At root, the EP’s failure to connect with voters across Europe is a consequence of the lack of a European ‘demos’. The EP’s brand of supranational democracy has been constructed from the top down, which is illustrated by the high degree of consensus between the main party groupings. Despite representing national parties of different political traditions, the established centre-right European People’s Party (EPP) and centre-left Socialist and Democrat (S&D) party families voted the same way 74% of the time in the 2009-14 parliament, with a heavy bias for “more Europe”. This denies voters a genuine choice, thoroughly undermining the very objective the EP is trying to achieve.

+ Full Report (PDF; 1.6 MB)

+ Press Release


Category:

Source:

Views: 807


Having begun his career in academic libraries, Adrian Janes has subsequently worked extensively in public libraries, chiefly in enquiry work as an Information Services librarian. In this role he has had particular responsibility for information from both the UK Government and the European Union. He wrote a detailed report on sources for the latter which was published by FreePint in 2007, and has contributed articles to FreePint and ResourceShelf. He is involved in training in information literacy and the use of online reference resources.

A Contributing Editor to DocuTicker, he also write reviews for Pennyblackmusic.

Adrian can be reached at adrian.janes@freepint.com

More articles by Adrian Janes »



Please note: DocuTicker's editors collect citations for full-text PDF reports freely available on the web but we do not archive these reports. When you click a link to find and/or download the report, you are leaving the DocuTicker site. DocuTicker makes no representations regarding the ongoing availability of any report or any external resource. Links were accurate as of the date of posting.

« All DocuBase Articles

 

FreePint

FreePint supports the value of information in the enterprise. Read more »


FeedLatest FreePint Content:


  • Click to view the article Product Review of LexisNexis Company Dossier (Technology - Search, Outputs & Alerts, User Interface & Help)
    Monday, 1st September 2014

    The third part of Chris Porter's review looks at the searching, filtering, list-building and exporting capabilities within LexisNexis Company Dossier, a research database providing information about companies, executives and industries. His scrutiny includes the "Compare Companies" feature and "Custom Report" tool.

  • Click to view the article Not Enough or Too Much? A Data Protection Dilemma
    Monday, 1st September 2014

    Companies know that compromising privacy is bad for business, which is why Microsoft is challenging official disclosure demands in the United States courts. Meanwhile a United States congressional thinktank has concerns about the protection of personal financial records, and a British survey shows just how much customers will punish companies that play fast and loose with their data. But has the pendulum now swung too far in the privacy direction? One survey suggests that the protectionist barriers against digital trade could cause a measurable contraction in gross domestic product - but governments know that privacy wins votes.

  • Click to view the article Risk & Compliance - Free Online Resources
    Monday, 1st September 2014

    Penny Crossland highlights some high quality free resources in the risk, regulatory and compliance sphere, presenting some alternatives to the "Big Three".

     

  • ... more ...

All FreePint Content »
FreePint Topics »


A FreePint Subscription delivers articles and reports that support your organisation's information practice, content and strategy.

Find out more and order a FreePint Subscription by visiting the
completing our online form: Subscription Order page.


FreePint Testimonials

"As a service providing practical support and guidance for what professionals do FreePint is pretty unique and decent value for money." ..."

Read more testimonials and supply yours »







 

 
 
 

Subscribe

Receive the DocuTicker Newsletter each week.

Find out more »

Article Categories

All Article Categories »

Sources

All DocuBase Sources »

Source Categories

All Source Categories »

Archive

All Archives »