Thursday, 20th December 2012
UK: Consumer Engagement with Energy Markets
Source: House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee (UK)
Consumer engagement with the energy market is low and there are various complex reasons for this. This lack of engagement is linked to low levels of competition and a high proportion of customers who are unlikely or unwilling to switch energy supplier in the near future. With little incentive for suppliers to offer consumers a better deal, some customers are getting worse deals than others, and this in turn reduces consumer trust in the energy industry. If Ofgem’s proposals to increase liquidity in the market do not deliver, DECC should be prepared to intervene.
The complexity of the market with its many and varied tariffs has been identified as a key reason for the lack of consumer engagement. Ofgem hopes to increase both engagement and competition by simplifying tariffs and making it easier for consumers to switch. The Government has also pledged to improve the situation for consumers by requiring providers to give all their customers the cheapest tariff they offer....
There is clear evidence that levels of consumer trust in energy suppliers is low, and this may in part derive from a lack of transparency. Some consumers blame energy company profits for rising prices. This is compounded by the lack of clear and understandable public information on energy company profits. Greater transparency is needed in respect of energy company profits and energy prices, including across the whole portfolio of vertically integrated companies.
What consumers pay for their energy will become increasingly important as the rising cost of investing in our energy infrastructure and of paying for DECC’s environmental and social policies is reflected in consumers’ bills over coming decades. Currently, there is some confusion about the impact of this investment on consumers’ bills, and media reporting of these issues has been criticised. Consumers don’t know who to trust for information about energy issues or where to go for advice, and this creates a further barrier to engagement. There is a case for streamlining the various sources of information to provide an independent, reliable and trustworthy source of information about energy issues.
+ Volume I (PDF; 464 KB)
+ Volume II (PDF; 1.4 MB)
By Adrian Janes
Having begun his career in academic libraries, Adrian Janes has subsequently worked extensively in public libraries, chiefly in enquiry work as an Information Services librarian. In this role he has had particular responsibility for information from both the UK Government and the European Union. He wrote a detailed report on sources for the latter which was published by FreePint in 2007, and has contributed articles to FreePint and ResourceShelf. He is involved in training in information literacy and the use of online reference resources.
A Contributing Editor to DocuTicker, he also write reviews for Pennyblackmusic.
Adrian can be reached at email@example.com
More articles by Adrian Janes »
Please note: DocuTicker's editors collect citations for full-text PDF reports freely available on the web but we do not archive these reports. When you click a link to find and/or download the report, you are leaving the DocuTicker site. DocuTicker makes no representations regarding the ongoing availability of any report or any external resource. Links were accurate as of the date of posting.