Home > DocuBase > Article

« All DocuBase Articles

 

Follow DocuTicker on Twitter Bookmark and Share   Feed

Wednesday, 12th January 2011

Institutional Conflicts of Interest at NIH Grantees

Institutional Conflicts of Interest at NIH Grantees (PDF)

Source:  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General

There are no Federal requirements that grantee institutions identify, report, and manage actual or potential institutional conflicts.  An institutional conflict may arise when an institution's own financial interests (e.g., royalties, equity, stockholdings, and gifts) or those of its senior officials pose risks of undue influence on decisions involving the institution's research. 

We surveyed 250 grantee institutions to determine whether they have developed any policies and procedures regarding institutional financial interests and conflicts.  We requested information on any institutional financial interests related to NIH grants awarded in fiscal year (FY) 2008.  A total of 156 institutions responded, for a response rate of 62 percent.  

We found that although not required for institutional financial interests, 70 of 156 responding NIH grantee institutions have written policies and procedures addressing these interests.  Fifty-nine of the seventy institutions with written policies and procedures regarding institutional financial interests have defined, in writing, what constitutes an institutional financial interest.  The three most common definitions are:  (1) institutional officials' individual financial interests, (2) equity held by the institution in publicly held entities, and (3) equity held by the institution in nonpublicly held entities.   

We also found that although not required for institutional conflicts, 69 of 156 responding NIH grantee institutions have written policies and procedures addressing these conflicts.  Fifty-nine of these institutions have defined, in writing, what constitutes an institutional conflict.  These institutions typically defined institutional conflicts as financial interests that could affect the research, decisionmaking, loyalty, or objectivity of either the institution or individuals. 

Grantee institutions that have written policies and procedures were more likely to identify conflicts (15 of 69 institutions) compared to those that do not (3 of 87 institutions).  Eighteen institutions identified at least 38 institutional conflicts related to NIH research grants in FY 2008.  The most common type of conflict was institutions' holding equity in nonpublicly held companies.  For institutions that identified institutional conflicts, the strategy most often used to address them was disclosure.

NIH should require grantee institutions to identify, report, and address institutional conflicts in a consistent and uniform manner.  It is important that NIH know of the existence of such conflicts so it can ensure that the related research is free from any intended or unintended bias. 

Therefore, we recommend that NIH promulgate regulations that address institutional financial conflicts of interest.  Until regulations are promulgated, NIH should encourage grantee institutions to develop policies and procedures regarding institutional financial interests and conflicts.  In response to our report, NIH stated that it is reviewing public comments to finalize regulations regarding financial conflicts of interest and, therefore, it neither concurs nor nonconcurs with our recommendation.  However, in the May 21, 2010, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding financial conflicts of interest, NIH proposed regulatory changes that focus only on researchers' conflicts.  The proposed regulations do not address institutional conflicts.  Therefore, OIG continues to recommend that NIH include institutional conflicts in regulations addressing financial conflicts of interest.


Category:

Source:

Views: 1191




Please note: DocuTicker's editors collect citations for full-text PDF reports freely available on the web but we do not archive these reports. When you click a link to find and/or download the report, you are leaving the DocuTicker site. DocuTicker makes no representations regarding the ongoing availability of any report or any external resource. Links were accurate as of the date of posting.

« All DocuBase Articles

 

FreePint

FreePint supports the value of information in the enterprise. Read more »


FeedLatest FreePint Content:


  • Click to view the article Mini Review of Red Flag Alert
    Monday, 20th October 2014

    Developed in 2003 by Begbies Traynor Group Plc, Red Flag Alert is a database containing more than 7.5 million records on businesses in the UK from sole traders to quoted companies. With in-depth company reports, business monitoring and sales and marketing data, it is used by those in accounting, law and property and can help anyone needing reliable UK company data.

  • Click to view the article Product Review of the InfoDesk Suite (Value - Competitors, Development & Pricing)
    Monday, 20th October 2014

    In the final part of her review of the InfoDesk suite of products for information management and current awareness knowledge tasks, Constance Ard reflects on the value the products offer users, setup requirements, and delves into product development plans. She also gives her view on competitive products.

  • Click to view the article Product Review of NewsEdge.com (Sources - Content & Coverage)
    Monday, 20th October 2014

    In the second part of his review of NewsEdge.com, Chris Porter considers how the news management tool curates, groups and presents content. He looks at sources by geographic region, content language and type, and describes archive searching options. North American sources are covered along with those from Europe; around 14% of sources relates to Asian countries and a similar proportion of the total are global in nature. An impressive range of language sources is included.

  • ... more ...

All FreePint Content »
FreePint Topics »


A FreePint Subscription delivers articles and reports that support your organisation's information practice, content and strategy.

Find out more and order a FreePint Subscription by visiting the
completing our online form: Subscription Order page.


FreePint Testimonials

"First of all, let me thank you for your time in reviewing PharmaCircle. We certainly appreciate your effort, comments and professionalism. We ..."

Read more testimonials and supply yours »







 

 
 
 

Subscribe

Receive the DocuTicker Newsletter each week.

Find out more »

Article Categories

All Article Categories »

Sources

All DocuBase Sources »

Source Categories

All Source Categories »

Archive

All Archives »