Home > DocuBase > Article

« All DocuBase Articles

 

Follow DocuTicker on Twitter   Feed

Wednesday, 12th January 2011

Institutional Conflicts of Interest at NIH Grantees

Institutional Conflicts of Interest at NIH Grantees (PDF)

Source:  U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General

There are no Federal requirements that grantee institutions identify, report, and manage actual or potential institutional conflicts.  An institutional conflict may arise when an institution's own financial interests (e.g., royalties, equity, stockholdings, and gifts) or those of its senior officials pose risks of undue influence on decisions involving the institution's research. 

We surveyed 250 grantee institutions to determine whether they have developed any policies and procedures regarding institutional financial interests and conflicts.  We requested information on any institutional financial interests related to NIH grants awarded in fiscal year (FY) 2008.  A total of 156 institutions responded, for a response rate of 62 percent.  

We found that although not required for institutional financial interests, 70 of 156 responding NIH grantee institutions have written policies and procedures addressing these interests.  Fifty-nine of the seventy institutions with written policies and procedures regarding institutional financial interests have defined, in writing, what constitutes an institutional financial interest.  The three most common definitions are:  (1) institutional officials' individual financial interests, (2) equity held by the institution in publicly held entities, and (3) equity held by the institution in nonpublicly held entities.   

We also found that although not required for institutional conflicts, 69 of 156 responding NIH grantee institutions have written policies and procedures addressing these conflicts.  Fifty-nine of these institutions have defined, in writing, what constitutes an institutional conflict.  These institutions typically defined institutional conflicts as financial interests that could affect the research, decisionmaking, loyalty, or objectivity of either the institution or individuals. 

Grantee institutions that have written policies and procedures were more likely to identify conflicts (15 of 69 institutions) compared to those that do not (3 of 87 institutions).  Eighteen institutions identified at least 38 institutional conflicts related to NIH research grants in FY 2008.  The most common type of conflict was institutions' holding equity in nonpublicly held companies.  For institutions that identified institutional conflicts, the strategy most often used to address them was disclosure.

NIH should require grantee institutions to identify, report, and address institutional conflicts in a consistent and uniform manner.  It is important that NIH know of the existence of such conflicts so it can ensure that the related research is free from any intended or unintended bias. 

Therefore, we recommend that NIH promulgate regulations that address institutional financial conflicts of interest.  Until regulations are promulgated, NIH should encourage grantee institutions to develop policies and procedures regarding institutional financial interests and conflicts.  In response to our report, NIH stated that it is reviewing public comments to finalize regulations regarding financial conflicts of interest and, therefore, it neither concurs nor nonconcurs with our recommendation.  However, in the May 21, 2010, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking regarding financial conflicts of interest, NIH proposed regulatory changes that focus only on researchers' conflicts.  The proposed regulations do not address institutional conflicts.  Therefore, OIG continues to recommend that NIH include institutional conflicts in regulations addressing financial conflicts of interest.


Category:

Source:

Views: 1193




Please note: DocuTicker's editors collect citations for full-text PDF reports freely available on the web but we do not archive these reports. When you click a link to find and/or download the report, you are leaving the DocuTicker site. DocuTicker makes no representations regarding the ongoing availability of any report or any external resource. Links were accurate as of the date of posting.

« All DocuBase Articles

 

FreePint

FreePint supports the value of information in the enterprise. Read more »


FeedLatest FreePint Content:


  • Click to view the article Q&A with Tallyfy - Innovations in Information Delivery
    Monday, 30th March 2015

    FreePint interviews Amit Kothari, founder and managing director of Tallyfy, a new tool to enable managers to easily share processes. Shimrit Janes asks for Amit's views on the challenges of making information more visible and he shares his concept of the three key strands of visibility: internal visibility of information, external visibility of information, and many-to-one visibility. He also gives his opinion on big data and why he feels the ultimate judge of new tools and technologies should be the people in the company who deliver revenue and value.

  • Click to view the article Does Digital Technology Pervade Our Lives?
    Monday, 30th March 2015

    Many of us can empathise with those people who declare they have become "addicted" to the latest digital technology. This might be Twitter, Facebook or a similar technology. Irrespective of the type of digital tool it can be all too easy to find yourself spending significant amounts of time using it and becoming "addicted". But is this really really true? In a recent article Paul Miller from the Digital Workplace Group argues that digital addiction is just a myth. James Mullan discusses whether addiction to the latest tools and technologies is a real problem.

  • Click to view the article Results from FreePint Research into Visibility Part 2 - Content
    Monday, 30th March 2015

    In the second part of her analysis of FreePint's research into visibility, Robin Neidorf digs down into the findings relating to content. Respondents were asked how they rate varying types of content such as licensed or inbound email content, as well as a host of other variations such as dissertations and research whitepapers. Questions also looked at the goals and objectives of visibility work and barriers to progress such as licensing issues and free search engines. Variations by industry were also investigated.

  • ... more ...

All FreePint Content »
FreePint Topics »


A FreePint Subscription delivers articles and reports that support your organisation's information practice, content and strategy.

Find out more and order a FreePint Subscription by visiting the
completing our online form: Subscription Order page.


FreePint Testimonials

"Participated in two FreePint Communities of Practice sessions: One focussed on Determining, Discussing & Measuring Value of Content, and ..."

Read more testimonials and supply yours »







 

 
 
 

Subscribe

Receive the DocuTicker Newsletter each week.

Find out more »

Article Categories

All Article Categories »

Sources

All DocuBase Sources »

Source Categories

All Source Categories »

Archive

All Archives »