Subscribe
Receive the weekly DocuTicker Newsletter.
Find out more »

Enter your
email address:

My Account »


Bookmark and Share

Testimonial?
If you find DocuTicker useful, please supply a testimonial »








Home > DocuBase > Article

« All DocuBase Articles

 

Follow DocuTicker on Twitter Bookmark and Share   \"Feed\"

Saturday, 4th September 2010

Climate Change Assessments: Review of the Processes and Procedures of the IPCC

Climate Change Assessments: Review of the Processes and Procedures of the IPCC
Source: InterAcademy Council: Committee to Review the IPCC
From the Executive Summary:

Climate change is a long-term challenge that will require every nation to make decisions about how to respond. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was established by the World Meteorological Organization and the United Nations Environment Programme to help inform such decisions by producing comprehensive assessments of what is known about the physical climate system, its global and regional impacts, and options for adaptation and mitigation. Sitting at the interface between science and politics, the IPCC assessment process has sustained a working dialog between the world’s governments and scientists since its inception in 1988. Representatives of 194 participating governments agree on the scope of the assessment, elect the scientific leaders of the assessment, nominate authors, review the results, and approve the summaries written for policy makers. More than a thousand volunteer scientists evaluate the available scientific, technological, and socioeconomic information on climate change, and draft and review the assessment reports. The thousands of scientists and government representatives who work on behalf of the IPCC in this non-traditional partnership are the major strength of the organization.

Through its assessment reports, the IPCC has gained enormous respect and even shared the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007 for informing climate policy and raising public awareness worldwide. However, amidst an increasingly intense public debate over the science, impacts, and cost of climate change, the IPCC has come under heightened scrutiny about its impartiality with respect to climate policy and about the accuracy and balance of its reports. In response, the United Nations and the IPCC commissioned the InterAcademy Council to convene a Committee to review the processes and procedures of the IPCC.

The Committee found that the IPCC assessment process has been successful overall. However, the world has changed considerably since the creation of the IPCC, with major advances in climate science, heated controversy on some climate-related issues, and an increased focus of governments on the impacts and potential responses to changing climate. A wide variety of interests have entered the climate discussion, leading to greater overall scrutiny and demands from stakeholders. The IPCC must continue to adapt to these changing conditions in order to continue serving society well in the future.

+ Direct link to full report (PDF; 1.6 MB)


Category:

Source:

Views: 1193



blog comments powered by Disqus

Please note: DocuTicker's editors collect citations for full-text PDF reports freely available on the web but we do not archive these reports. When you click a link to find and/or download the report, you are leaving the DocuTicker site. DocuTicker makes no representations regarding the ongoing availability of any report or any external resource. Links were accurate as of the date of posting.

« All DocuBase Articles

 

Read about the FreePint FamilyThe FreePint Family is a family of resources to help information workers be more effective, raise the value of information in their organisations and contribute to success.

'FreePint... provides most of my professional development because it won't come through work and [other resources] just don't cut it.'

Read about the FreePint Family »


Visit the FreePint ShopFreePint Shop: FreePint sells reports, resources and subscription products to support your information work and information-related decisions.

Latest: FUMSI Report: Folio on Conferences and Continuing Professional Development (26 Jan 2012) | FreePint Research Report: Information Governance Policies and Priorities (25 Jan 2012) | Docuticker Report: DocuTips on Health Literacy (19 Jan 2012) | VIP Magazine: 98 (18 Jan 2012) | VIP Report: Product Review of NovaRes (18 Jan 2012)

Browse the FreePint Shop »


FUMSI ForumFUMSI Forum: Do you have a research question? Post it to the FUMSI Forum, where professionals share Q&A and useful tips on how to Find, Use, Manage and Share Information. It's free.

Latest FUMSI Forum postings: Most Shared Content on Sharing Information (01 Feb 2012) | Our own worst enemy? - a FUMSI Editorial (01 Feb 2012) | [TIPPLE] eBook resources - Manage (31 Jan 2012) | "Frictionless sharing" - exploring the c (31 Jan 2012) | Most Shared Content on Managing Information (25 Jan 2012)

Visit the FUMSI Forum and post »


VIP LiveWireVIP LiveWire: Offers commentary on emerging news stories of interest to premium content users, vendors and industry insiders.

Latest VIP LiveWire postings: More ways for employers to poke around (01 Feb 2012) | Trust your supplier? Check with the Armadillo (01 Feb 2012) | Cloudy with a chance of... (01 Feb 2012) | Seven Sins: making information fun & meaningful (01 Feb 2012) | Freemium: from razor blades to info vendors (31 Jan 2012)

Visit the VIP LiveWire »







Subscribe

Receive the DocuTicker Newsletter each week.

Find out more »

DocuTicker sponsored by:

Article Categories

All Article Categories »

Sources

All DocuBase Sources »

Source Categories

All Source Categories »

Archive

All Archives »

FreePint Shop

DocuTicker Report: DocuTips on Health LiteracyFeatured Report:
DocuTicker Report: DocuTips on Health Literacy: "What has traditionally been understood as literacy has been disrupted, like so much else, by the advent of the Internet. No longer is it regarded as simply the ability to read and write. In the Information Age, information literacy is a concept that recognises skills in judging trustworthiness and quality as critical. Such matters of accurate interpretation have long been among the concerns of scholars."

Learn more and order »