Subscribe
Receive the weekly DocuTicker Newsletter.
Find out more »

Enter your
email address:

My Account »


Bookmark and Share

Testimonial?
If you find DocuTicker useful, please supply a testimonial »








Home > DocuBase > Article

« All DocuBase Articles

 

Follow DocuTicker on Twitter Bookmark and Share   \"Feed\"

Wednesday, 18th August 2010

New Study - Chemical Insecurity - America’s Most Dangerous Chemical Companies Put Millions of Americans at Risk and Spend More Than $70M to Fend Off Regulation

New Study - Chemical Insecurity - America’s Most Dangerous Chemical Companies Put Millions of Americans at Risk and Spend More Than $70M to Fend Off Regulation
Source: U.S.Public Interest Research Group

A new U.S. Public Interest Research Group report identifies the 14 chemical companies that endanger the most Americans in the event of a chemical release. These companies also spent more than 70 million dollars lobbying and bankrolling the campaigns of the Members of Congress on the committees that oversee chemical security policy.

U.S. PIRG’s research also shows how many of the lobbyists hired by these 14 companies participate in the so-called “revolving door” of lobbying employment—moving from positions on the committees of jurisdiction to lobbying the members on them.
...
Key finding of the report include:

  • The fourteen companies with the most people in the danger zones in the event of an accident or attack on one of their facilities are: Clorox, Kuehne Chemical, JCI Jones, KIK Custom Products, DuPont, PVS Chemicals, Olin, DX Holding, Solvay, Valero, Occidental Petroleum, Honeywell, Dow Chemical, and Sunoco..
  • The Clorox Company, Kuehne Chemical, and JCI Jones Chemical each own facilities that together put more than 12 million people at risk.
  • These fourteen companies and their affiliated trade associations spent $69,286,198 lobbying the committees with jurisdiction over chemical security legislation in 2008 and 2009—Energy and Commerce and Homeland Security in the House, and Environment and Public Works and Homeland Security and Government Oversight in the Senate.
  • The political action committees (PACs) of these fourteen companies and the PACs of their affiliated trade associations gave $2,187,868 in the 2008 election cycle and the 2010 cycle to date directly to the campaigns of members of the committees of jurisdiction over chemical security legislation.
  • These fourteen companies and their affiliated trade associations employ 20 ‘revolving door’ lobbyists who previously staffed the committees of jurisdiction over chemical security and toxics before becoming lobbyists on those same issues.

+ Full Report


Category:

Source:

Views: 234



blog comments powered by Disqus

Please note: DocuTicker's editors collect citations for full-text PDF reports freely available on the web but we do not archive these reports. When you click a link to find and/or download the report, you are leaving the DocuTicker site. DocuTicker makes no representations regarding the ongoing availability of any report or any external resource. Links were accurate as of the date of posting.

« All DocuBase Articles

 

Read about the FreePint FamilyThe FreePint Family is a family of resources to help information workers be more effective, raise the value of information in their organisations and contribute to success.

'FreePint... provides most of my professional development because it won't come through work and [other resources] just don't cut it.'

Read about the FreePint Family »


Visit the FreePint ShopFreePint Shop: FreePint sells reports, resources and subscription products to support your information work and information-related decisions.

Latest: FUMSI Report: Folio on Conferences and Continuing Professional Development (26 Jan 2012) | FreePint Research Report: Information Governance Policies and Priorities (25 Jan 2012) | Docuticker Report: DocuTips on Health Literacy (19 Jan 2012) | VIP Magazine: 98 (18 Jan 2012) | VIP Report: Product Review of NovaRes (18 Jan 2012)

Browse the FreePint Shop »


FUMSI ForumFUMSI Forum: Do you have a research question? Post it to the FUMSI Forum, where professionals share Q&A and useful tips on how to Find, Use, Manage and Share Information. It's free.

Latest FUMSI Forum postings: Most Shared Content on Sharing Information (01 Feb 2012) | Our own worst enemy? - a FUMSI Editorial (01 Feb 2012) | [TIPPLE] eBook resources - Manage (31 Jan 2012) | "Frictionless sharing" - exploring the c (31 Jan 2012) | Most Shared Content on Managing Information (25 Jan 2012)

Visit the FUMSI Forum and post »


VIP LiveWireVIP LiveWire: Offers commentary on emerging news stories of interest to premium content users, vendors and industry insiders.

Latest VIP LiveWire postings: More ways for employers to poke around (01 Feb 2012) | Trust your supplier? Check with the Armadillo (01 Feb 2012) | Cloudy with a chance of... (01 Feb 2012) | Seven Sins: making information fun & meaningful (01 Feb 2012) | Freemium: from razor blades to info vendors (31 Jan 2012)

Visit the VIP LiveWire »







Subscribe

Receive the DocuTicker Newsletter each week.

Find out more »

DocuTicker sponsored by:

Article Categories

All Article Categories »

Sources

All DocuBase Sources »

Source Categories

All Source Categories »

Archive

All Archives »

FreePint Shop

DocuTicker Report: DocuTips on Health LiteracyFeatured Report:
DocuTicker Report: DocuTips on Health Literacy: "What has traditionally been understood as literacy has been disrupted, like so much else, by the advent of the Internet. No longer is it regarded as simply the ability to read and write. In the Information Age, information literacy is a concept that recognises skills in judging trustworthiness and quality as critical. Such matters of accurate interpretation have long been among the concerns of scholars."

Learn more and order »